Iran has refuted claims of an imminent landmark agreement with the United States, citing unresolved issues despite advancements in the negotiations. Esmail Baghaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, acknowledged that while there has been mutual understanding on many fronts, a conclusive deal remains elusive. He attributed the delays to mixed messages originating from Washington and interference by Israel.
A central aspect of the discussions involves the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. Iran has clarified that while it does not plan to levy tolls on passing vessels, it may impose charges for navigational and environmental services, in coordination with Oman. Additionally, Iran has emphasized that any potential agreement must encompass a ceasefire in Lebanon and the removal of restrictions on its ports and shipping activities.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has characterized the ongoing discussions as significant, with a proposed framework involving a 30-day period following a ceasefire. During this time, Iran would be expected to clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz and ensure unhindered maritime access. Concurrently, the U.S. military has confirmed recent strikes in southern Iran, targeting sites associated with missile launches and boats allegedly preparing to lay mines. Washington has described these actions as defensive measures, while continuing to support ceasefire initiatives.
President Donald Trump has emphasized that any final agreement with Iran must be “great and meaningful,” otherwise, there would be no deal. He has also encouraged several Middle Eastern nations to join the Abraham Accords to normalize relations with Israel, though regional leaders have reportedly shown limited interest in this proposal. A significant sticking point remains Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. While Tehran has expressed willingness to reduce enrichment levels temporarily, it has rejected calls to transfer its uranium stockpile abroad. Iran is also seeking the release of billions in overseas frozen assets.
Iranian officials have pointed to political divisions within the U.S., including criticism from Congress and factions of the Republican Party, as factors complicating the White House’s position and the broader negotiation process. The current proposal notably omits addressing Iran’s ballistic missile program and its support for regional militant groups, rendering it less comprehensive than previous U.S. demands.